Home / Technology / Supreme Court to Hear Samsung Appeal on Apple Patent Award

Supreme Court to Hear Samsung Appeal on Apple Patent Award

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal from Samsung, the Korean electronics company, on what t must pay Apple for infringing part of the design of the iPhone. In a brief supporting Samsung, companies including Google and Facebook said the legal framework governing the design patents that Samsung was held to have infringed was “out of step with modern technology.”

Design patents are far less common than utility patents, which cover how products work. Design patents address what products look like. Samsung argued that design patents are poorly suited to complex devices with many features, adding that they can give rise to disproportionate penalties.

Design patents once covered household items like spoons and fireplace grates, and a finding of infringement required the defendant to turn over all of its profits. Samsung argued that this “total profit rule” does not make sense in the digital era and would “reward design patents far beyond the value of any inventive contribution.”

The Supreme Court has not heard a design patent case in more than a century.

In December, Samsung agreed to pay Apple $ 548 million in damages in the case, but it reserved the right to appeal the case to the Supreme Court.

The three design elements at issue in the case, Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc., No. 15-777, are, in Samsung’s description, “a particular black rectangular round-cornered front face”; “a substantially similar rectangular round-cornered front face plus the surrounding rim”; and “a particular colorful grid of sixteen icons.”

In urging the Supreme Court not to hear the case, Apple said the justices should not reward a copycat.

“The iPhone’s explosive success was due in no small part to its innovative design, which included a distinctive front face and a colorful graphical user interface — features protected by U.S. design patents,” the company’s brief said. “The innovation and beauty of Apple’s designs were not only hailed by consumers and the press, but envied by Apple’s fiercest competitor Samsung, which by its executive’s own admission in related litigation is a ‘fast follower’ rather than an innovator.”

The justices agreed to decide only one of the questions on which Samsung had sought review: “Where a design patent is applied to only a component of a product, should an award of infringer’s profits be limited to those profits attributable to the component?”

Continue reading the main story


NYT > Technology

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*